A NOCA For British Farmers | Scamdemics & Climate Crap
As the government threatens to launch more utterly nefarious scamdemics and climate crap, the UCT Remedy Squad hereby presents a barnstorming three letter process to establish the facts regarding UK Farming and ‘Net Zero’ policies.
This process has already been successfully used by a high profile regenerative farmer, the identity of whom will be revealed when I interview them on my podcast in the near future, when we will discuss the entire process and the UK Government’s response to it [if any].
In the meantime, feel free to use these three notices in the event the government attempts to impose its fraudulent ‘viruses’, ‘diseases’ and ‘climate change’ policies upon your farm or smallholding.
Notice of Conditional Acceptance
In most UCT administrative processes, the first missive is a Notice of Conditional Acceptance, which asks the respondents very reasonably to provide material evidence to substantiate the dubious claims their policies are founded upon.
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
1st Floor
Seacole Block
2 Marsham Street
London
SW1P 4DF
FAO: DEFRA, Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs; Tamara Finkelstein, Permanent Secretary, Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; Steve Barclay MP, Animal and Plant Health Agency; David Holdsworth CEO, The Chartered Trading Standards Institute; John Herriman Chief Executive.
Add Date
NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Dear Sir / Madam,
Regarding the UK Government’s farming policies including, but not limited to, livestock registration, tagging, movement restrictions, and ‘Net Zero’ policies.
DEFRA’s website claims that: ‘Tracing animals helps to control and eradicate bovine diseases such as Tuberculosis (TB), Bovine Viral Diarrhoea (BVD) or foot and mouth disease. It protects
consumers by making sure that products in the human food chain are safe’.
DEFRA’s website also claims that: “The leading scientists in the world agree that the earth is getting warmer and that most of this warming is the result of human activities.” However, it doesn’t say how the research was funded or what influence has been brought to bear or give any independent proof that this is actually the case.
I hereby conditionally agree that the above claims are true and that DEFRA’s policies are necessary and in the public interest upon receipt of the following reasonably requested items:
1) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, of purified and isolated particles assumed to be ‘viruses/prions’ taken directly from the fluids of a sick human or animal without culturing, that are then confirmed via Electron microscopy.
2) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, that these purified and isolated particles were proven to be pathogenic naturally, via adherence to the long-established scientific method.
3) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, of a primary publication and/or a primary specialist peer reviewed paper that shows the use of purified mycobacterium bovis and the scientific method to prove causation of the alleged disease, Tuberculosis, in cattle.
4) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, of a preceding thorough investigation using the scientific method into other possible environmental causes for disease and sickness in livestock, and that all other possible environmental causes have been ruled out, including vaccine damage and inappropriate feed contaminated by toxic agricultural chemicals.
5) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, that the government policies being enforced are not fraudulent in nature and that in reality they do not comprise a real and present threat to British farming, by seeking to eradicate the entire industry by 2030.
6) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, of an independent (i.e. not funded by vested corporate interests) primary publication relied upon by the IPCC that evidences the use of the scientific method to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that CO2 is responsible for temperature rises.
7) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, that the effects we are witnessing attributed to the alleged ‘climate crisis’ are not largely attributable to land management practices historically condoned and encouraged by DEFRA, such as but not limited to: deforestation; deep ploughing, mono-cropping and other soil-destroying practices that lead to biodiversity loss; mass chemical poisoning of the Earth with glyphosate, pesticides and other agricultural chemicals; building on flood plains.
8) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, of a primary publication and/or a primary specialist peer reviewed paper which shows that geoengineering programmes conducted and recorded internationally by the OAA (Oceanic and Atmospheric Research); NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and locally by councils, in line with the Paris Climate Agreement and the UN SDG’s, are not giving the false impression of a ‘climate crisis’.
9) Material evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, that in the event the above questions cannot be answered, DEFRA is not guilty of multiple breaches of sections 2, 3 and 4 of the Fraud Act 2006.
Given the serious adverse impact of DEFRA’s policies upon the environment, food supply, nutrition, businesses and people’s livelihoods, you have 7 days to respond appropriately to this Notice.
In the event you fail to provide these reasonably requested items, your failure will comprise the tacit procuration of your agreement and the lawful presumption that the requested items do not exist, and that the basis for the alleged lawfulness of your policies is entirely predicated upon plainly false and dishonest statements. Therefore all respondents are responsible and personally liable for multiple breaches of the Fraud Act 2006 without prejudice to any and all civil claims for damages.
Without malice or mischief, in sincerity and honour,
Add Your Signature
Mailing location:
Add Your Address.
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse
Non-Assumpsit Errors & Omissions Excepted – Strictly no rights of Usufruct
Notice of Opportunity To Cure
In the near certain event that the list of respondents fail to respond appropriately to the first notice, it’s time to send the Notice of Opportunity To Cure by recorded mail.
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
1st Floor
Seacole Block
2 Marsham Street
London
SW1P 4DF
FAO: DEFRA, Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs; Tamara Finkelstein, Permanent Secretary, Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; Steve Barclay MP, Animal and Plant Health Agency; David Holdsworth CEO, The Chartered Trading Standards Institute; John Herriman Chief Executive.
Add Date
NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO CURE
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Dear Sir / Madam,
Regarding the UK Government’s farming policies including, but not limited to, livestock registration, tagging, movement restrictions, and ‘Net Zero’ policies.
DEFRA’s website claims that: ‘Tracing animals helps to control and eradicate bovine diseases such as Tuberculosis (TB), Bovine Viral Diarrhoea (BVD) or foot and mouth disease. It protects
consumers by making sure that products in the human food chain are safe’.
DEFRA’s website also claims that: “The leading scientists in the world agree that the earth is getting warmer and that most of this warming is the result of human activities.” However, it doesn’t say how the research was funded or what influence has been brought to bear or give any independent proof that this is actually the case.
Following your failure to respond appropriately to the NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE dated [ADD DATE], I hereby serve NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO CURE. Therefore, please provide me with the following items without delay:
1) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, of purified and isolated particles assumed to be ‘viruses/prions’ taken directly from the fluids of a sick human or animal without culturing, that are then confirmed via Electron microscopy.
2) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, that these purified and isolated particles were proven to be pathogenic naturally, via adherence to the long-established scientific method.
3) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, of a primary publication and/or a primary specialist peer reviewed paper that shows the use of purified mycobacterium bovis and the scientific method to prove causation of the alleged disease, Tuberculosis, in cattle.
4) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, of a preceding thorough investigation using the scientific method into other possible environmental causes for disease and sickness in livestock, and that all other possible environmental causes have been ruled out, including vaccine damage and inappropriate feed contaminated by toxic agricultural chemicals.
5) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, that the government policies being enforced are not fraudulent in nature and that in reality they do not comprise a real and present threat to British farming, by seeking to eradicate the entire industry by 2030.
6) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, of an independent (i.e. not funded by vested corporate interests) primary publication relied upon by the IPCC that evidences the use of the scientific method to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that CO2 is responsible for temperature rises.
7) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, that the effects we are witnessing attributed to the alleged ‘climate crisis’ are not largely attributable to land management practices historically condoned and encouraged by DEFRA, such as but not limited to: deforestation; deep ploughing, mono-cropping and other soil-destroying practices that lead to biodiversity loss; mass chemical poisoning of the Earth with glyphosate, pesticides and other agricultural chemicals; building on flood plains.
8) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, of a primary publication and/or a primary specialist peer reviewed paper which shows that geoengineering programmes conducted and recorded internationally by the OAA (Oceanic and Atmospheric Research); NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and locally by councils, in line with the Paris Climate Agreement and the UN SDG’s, are not giving the false impression of a ‘climate crisis’.
9) Material evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, that in the event the above questions cannot be answered, DEFRA is not guilty of multiple breaches of sections 2, 3 and 4 of the Fraud Act 2006.
Given the serious adverse impact of DEFRA’s policies upon the environment, food supply, nutrition, businesses and people’s livelihoods, you have 7 days to respond appropriately to this Notice.
In the event you fail to provide these reasonably requested items, your failure will comprise the tacit procuration of your agreement and the lawful presumption that the requested items do not exist, and that the basis for the alleged lawfulness of your policies is entirely predicated upon plainly false and dishonest statements. Therefore all respondents are responsible and personally liable for multiple breaches of the Fraud Act 2006 without prejudice to any and all civil claims for damages.
Without malice or mischief, in sincerity and honour,
Add Your Signature
Mailing location:
Add Your Address.
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse
Non-Assumpsit Errors & Omissions Excepted – Strictly no rights of Usufruct
Notice of Default
In the almost certain event that the respondents fail to respond appropriately to the first two notices, Notice of Default should be served by recorded mail.
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
1st Floor
Seacole Block
2 Marsham Street
London
SW1P 4DF
FAO: DEFRA, Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs; Tamara Finkelstein, Permanent Secretary, Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; Steve Barclay MP, Animal and Plant Health Agency; David Holdsworth CEO, The Chartered Trading Standards Institute; John Herriman Chief Executive.
Add Date
NOTICE OF DEFAULT
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
Dear Sir / Madam,
Regarding the UK Government’s farming policies including, but not limited to, livestock registration, tagging, movement restrictions, and ‘Net Zero’ policies.
Following your failure to respond appropriately to the NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE dated Add Date, and NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO CURE dated Add Date, I hereby serve NOTICE OF DEFAULT.
Please be advised that, by tacit procuration, you are now in agreement that the following items do not exist:
1) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, of purified and isolated particles assumed to be ‘viruses/prions’ taken directly from the fluids of a sick human or animal without culturing, that are then confirmed via Electron microscopy.
2) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, that these purified and isolated particles were proven to be pathogenic naturally, via adherence to the long-established scientific method.
3) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, of a primary publication and/or a primary specialist peer reviewed paper that shows the use of purified mycobacterium bovis and the scientific method to prove causation of the alleged disease, Tuberculosis, in cattle.
4) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, of a preceding thorough investigation using the scientific method into other possible environmental causes for disease and sickness in livestock, and that all other possible environmental causes have been ruled out, including vaccine damage and inappropriate feed contaminated by toxic agricultural chemicals.
5) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, that the government policies being enforced are not fraudulent in nature and that in reality they do not comprise a real and present threat to British farming, by seeking to eradicate the entire industry by 2030.
6) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, of an independent (i.e. not funded by vested corporate interests) primary publication relied upon by the IPCC that evidences the use of the scientific method to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that CO2 is responsible for temperature rises.
7) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, that the effects we are witnessing attributed to the alleged ‘climate crisis’ are not largely attributable to land management practices historically condoned and encouraged by DEFRA, such as but not limited to: deforestation; deep ploughing, mono-cropping and other soil-destroying practices that lead to biodiversity loss; mass chemical poisoning of the Earth with glyphosate, pesticides and other agricultural chemicals; building on flood plains.
8) Material and substantive evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, of a primary publication and/or a primary specialist peer reviewed paper which shows that geoengineering programmes conducted and recorded internationally by the OAA (Oceanic and Atmospheric Research); NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and locally by councils, in line with the Paris Climate Agreement and the UN SDG’s, are not giving the false impression of a ‘climate crisis’.
9) Material evidence, not mere hearsay or professional opinion, that in the event the above questions cannot be answered, DEFRA is not guilty of multiple breaches of sections 2, 3 and 4 of the Fraud Act 2006.
As per the Common Law, I may now issue any and all legal proceedings deemed necessary to recover any and all losses, injuries and damages caused by your unlawful farming policies and their complete dependence upon false and dishonest statements, without further notice.
Without malice or mischief, in sincerity and honour,
Add Your Signature
Mailing location:
Add Your Address.
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse
Non-Assumpsit Errors & Omissions Excepted – Strictly no rights of Usufruct
